海归网首页   海归宣言   导航   博客   广告位价格  
海归论坛首页 会员列表 
收 藏 夹 
论坛帮助 
登录 | 登录并检查站内短信 | 个人设置 论坛首页 |  排行榜  |  在线私聊 |  专题 | 版规 | 搜索  | RSS  | 注册 | 活动日历
主题: [讨论]技术前瞻:美股或将现中期底,反弹之前可能出现清除弱手的震仓行情
回复主题   printer-friendly view    海归论坛首页 -> 海归商务           焦点讨论 | 精华区 | 嘉宾沙龙 | 白领丽人沙龙
  阅读上一个主题 :: 阅读下一个主题
作者 [讨论]技术前瞻:美股或将现中期底,反弹之前可能出现清除弱手的震仓行情   
所跟贴 good points. plus the u.s. gov. printed so many green papers -- 黄埔半期 - (82 Byte) 2008-6-27 周五, 08:19 (269 reads)
theoretical
[博客]
[个人文集]




头衔: 海归上校

头衔: 海归上校
声望: 院士
性别: 性别:男
加入时间: 2006/10/13
文章: 5521

海归分: 69567





文章标题: Read followings, GS is really a Dog Shi#t (343 reads)      时间: 2008-6-27 周五, 08:35   

作者:theoretical海归商务 发贴, 来自【海归网】 http://www.haiguinet.com

Fed May Ease Rules on Private Equity Bank Stakes: WSJ

By Reuters | 26 Jun 2008 | 05:32 PM ET


The U.S. Federal Reserve is considering steps to make it easier for private-equity firms and others to invest in banks, the Wall Street Journal reported on Thursday, a move that could open the door to more capital for cash-starved banks.

The Fed is expected to offer more clarity about what exactly outside investors can and can't do when they want to acquire sizable stakes in financial institutions but avoid direct regulatory supervision, the Journal said in a report on its website, citing regulators and other people familiar with the matter.

"We are looking at ways we can make those things more workable and gain from the experience we've had over the past few years," Federal Reserve general counsel Scott Alvarez told the paper.

Federal Reserve officials were not immediately available to comment on the report.

Any easing of obstacles to private equity firms making sizable investments in banks could be a catalyst for cash infusions. That has the potential to relieve some of the pressure on lenders, many of which need to shore up balance sheets amid the worst banking crisis in decades, the paper said.

Banks have raised money from government investment funds, mutual funds and other investors, often through public offerings of stock or other securities.

There are indications that the capital pool is starting to dry up at a time when many financial institutions are still bleeding.

Fed officials recently have met with big buyout firms, including J.C. Flowers, Carlyle Group, Kohlberg Kravis Roberts and Warburg Pincus, and banking lawyers to discuss the obstacles, according to people familiar with the matter.

In an opion article in Thursday's printed edition of the Journal, Carlyle directors Randal Quarles and Olivier Sarkozy, said private equity firms stand ready to invest in the bank sector should the restrictions get eased.

Under federal law, to own more than 24.9 percent of a bank, an entity must register as a bank holding company, which is subject to heavy regulation and can be forced to serve as a "source of strength" for the bank, the Journal said.

Ownership of more than 9.9 percent of a bank also subjects the entity to regulatory scrutiny to ensure that it isn't controlling—or even influencing—the bank's operations.

The Fed can't change those laws, but it has room to maneuver in how it interprets them.


WASHINGTON -(Dow Jones)- The U.S. House of Representatives - on a day when crude oil prices hit a record high - voted Thursday to order the nation's energy market regulator to use its emergency powers to immediately curb excessive energy market speculation.

The 402-19 vote was in favor of a bill that calls on the Commodity Futures Trading Commission to more aggressively police the energy markets it oversees.

The overwhelming vote indicates that both parties want the CFTC to step up its review of whether speculation is contributing to rising prices and be prepared to take dramatic steps. Those steps could range from increasing the amount of money that traders must put down to bet on the direction of energy prices to temporarily shutting down the markets.

"Speculation is part of the problem," said Rep. Chris Van Hollen, D-Md. Forcing the CFTC to use its emergency powers "opens up a whole set of new tools that they are not using."

It isn't clear that the bill will make it into law. The U.S. Senate won't take up the bill until next month at the earliest, and many people are betting it won't get past the Senate. Even then there is the risk that both chambers would need a two-thirds majority to override a presidential veto.

While the White House hasn't said whether it would veto the bill, the Bush administration has downplayed the role of speculation and maintained that oil prices are rising because of growing worldwide demand.

"The CFTC has the appropriate authority and oversight to review energy markets," said White House spokesman Tony Fratto. "The most important factor in rising oil prices is increasing global demand."

The vote came on a day when crude oil futures hit a record above $140 a barrel after OPEC's president said prices could rise above $150 a barrel.

Some lawmakers say that prices that have more than doubled over the past year are due in part to a flood of money entering the commodity futures markets.

Wall Street firms are concerned about the talk of further congressional action. They have been making a case that speculation is not the same thing as manipulation, and arguing that speculators are necessary for markets to function. Their lobbying appears to have helped shape many of the bills floating around Capitol Hill, but has been unable to fully thwart Congress amid ever- rising prices.

Speculators account for an estimated 70% of trading in U.S. markets, up from about 57% three years ago, according to the CFTC.

But the CFTC has said that it isn't clear whether speculators are driving up prices, since some people may be betting that prices will fall, while others may be betting that prices will rise. The agency has promised to report to Congress by mid-September on the role played a category of trader known as swaps dealers - the big Wall Street banks involved in energy trading.

But that is not quick enough for lawmakers, who head back to their districts for the U.S. Independence Day holiday expecting an earful from constituents. Voter frustration is evident in a series of letters written to the Federal Trade Commission, which is currently studying whether it should write rules to ban manipulation in the oil industry. "We, the people, are tired of the manipulation of the market by third parties," wrote someone who identified himself as Johnny Herring from Arkansas. "Oil should not be traded as it is now."

The bill will take the CFTC "off the slow pace of collecting data," said Michael Greenberger, a former CFTC official. "This says quickly look into the question of whether these markets are unhinged from supply-demand principles, and gives them the power for imposing margin limits, speculation limits. They've often used emergency powers to impose moratoria on trading, even barring certain contracts from being traded."

Regulators would also be able to take a look at over-the-counter markets, which are traditionally off-limits to the CFTC. And emergency powers would give them more ability to look at trading on overseas exchanges that operate through trading terminals ba<x>sed in the U.S.

The U.S. Senate may take up a similar measure later this summer, according to a spokesman for Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev. With numerous bills dealing with energy market speculation under consideration, it isn&apos;t clear which measure, if any, might become law.

CFTC spokeswoman Ianthe Zabel said Wednesday that the agency "is implementing a number of initiatives to enhance market oversight and transparency in the energy futures markets and recently disclosed our ongoing nationwide crude oil investigation."

The CFTC has already stepped up its oversight, including through an agreement with U.K. regulators that gives the agency access to information about trading in a key oil contract on the IntercontinentalExchange Inc. (NYSE:ICE) (ICE)&apos;s ICE Futures Europe. The exchange - whose data centers are located in Chicago but which is ba<x>sed nominally in London - also agreed to set limits on trading in its oil contract that are comparable to the limits on Nymex Holdings Inc.&apos;s (NYSE:NMX) (NMX) New York Mercantile Exchange.

The bill is H.R. 6377.

-By Siobhan Hughes, Dow Jones Newswires; 202-862-6654; Siobhan.Hughes@ dowjones.com

Corrected Thursday, June 26, 2008 18:59 ET (22:59 GMT)

Trading by Wall Street swaps dealers on behalf of financial investors and commodity companies, along with non-commercial traders such as hedge funds, accounts for an estimated 70% of trading in U.S. markets, up from about 57% three years ago, according to the CFTC.

作者:theoretical海归商务 发贴, 来自【海归网】 http://www.haiguinet.com









相关主题
[分享]技术前瞻:美股或大幅回调 海外移民 2008-5-08 周四, 10:03
[转帖]技术前瞻:标普酝酿攻势 海归主坛 2008-8-28 周四, 10:13
俄罗斯战略及技术专家:美、中两国军事力量对比 海归茶馆 2007-2-25 周日, 09:27
[ZT]网友技术分析:为什么美国男人不包二奶? 海归酒吧 2011-8-20 周六, 23:03
“以貌取人”技术讲座:案例分析:返美签证险被拒,只因我穿了件不对路的衣服(转帖) 海归茶馆 2009-12-26 周六, 06:26
“以貌取人”技术讲座:如何通过美国海关 (二)—— 一个被抓的实例并附案例分析 海归茶馆 2004-12-18 周六, 04:25
“以貌取人”技术讲座:如何通过美国海关 -- 闲谈美国海关的“以貌取人” 海归茶馆 2004-12-12 周日, 20:35
[问题]技术咨询:如何对当地所有广播电台电视台(频道)自动同时实行24小时... 海归主坛 2013-6-20 周四, 13:12

返回顶端
阅读会员资料 theoretical离线  发送站内短信
显示文章:     
回复主题   printer-friendly view    海归论坛首页 -> 海归商务           焦点讨论 | 精华区 | 嘉宾沙龙 | 白领丽人沙龙 所有的时间均为 北京时间


 
论坛转跳:   
不能在本论坛发表新主题, 不能回复主题, 不能编辑自己的文章, 不能删除自己的文章, 不能发表投票, 您 不可以 发表活动帖子在本论坛, 不能添加附件不能下载文件, 
   热门标签 更多...
   论坛精华荟萃 更多...
   博客热门文章 更多...


海归网二次开发,based on phpbb
Copyright © 2005-2026 Haiguinet.com. All rights reserved.